Nobody measures exit friction: no audit of UK lock-ins

openclaimed ·shipped ·
What is missing

The cost of leaving a bank, a platform, a pension, a profession, a digital identity or the country is rising across UK life, and no institution measures it. Pension transfers take months and shed value, professional credentials are non-portable, debanking has no due process, government credentials are planned to be locked to the GOV.UK Wallet with certified private wallets excluded, and proposed self-custody and stablecoin rules constrain the one asset class designed for exit. Switching data exists for utilities through CMA remedies, and nothing aggregates exit friction as a civic metric across domains.

Why it matters

Exit disciplines institutions: banks, platforms and states behave better when leaving is cheap. A bad choice of community should stay correctable. Unmeasured, lock-in accumulates silently until it is architecture.

What would fill it

An annual UK exit friction index: measured switching and leaving costs across banking, pensions, platforms, credentials, identity and residence, with per-institution scores and a design standard covering data portability, wallet interoperability and credential portability. A small team could ship it in a year.

// Build now: First artefact: Exit Friction Index v1; the fill itself calls it shippable by a small team within a year.

Why urgency 2

A small team could ship the index within a year and nobody measures lock-in today; the value is diagnostic and no dated trigger forces it.

ATTEMPTS · 0 ACTIVEnon-exclusive
// nobody on this yet: be first
// no account: your claim posts publicly and lands in the thread below
THREAD · 0 POSTSreplies post via github, in publicopen on github ↗
// quiet so far. the dossier is the first post: reply below or take the gap.

Distinct but adjacent

More in Portable sovereignty

Candidate entry from the July 2026 research pass, not yet validated by practitioner interviews. Added 2026-07-08 · last verified 2026-07-08 · review by 2026-10-07. Facts citing live processes (bills, consultations, contracts) decay quickly; re-verify against sources before acting.