No open, privacy-preserving attribute-verification infrastructure independent of the state digital ID

openclaimed ·shipped ·
What is missing

Online Safety Act age-assurance duties pushed millions of users through proprietary age-verification providers from July 2025. The government's digital ID consultation closed in June 2026, with a People's Panel concluding on 21 June, and the incoming government scrapped the scheme a month later. Identity checks keep spreading anyway, through age assurance, right-to-work and private verification. The DIATF trust framework certifies providers like Yoti and does not mandate unlinkability or selective disclosure. No open-source, zero-knowledge attribute-proof standard exists for UK services to adopt freely. ORG and Big Brother Watch critique the schemes, and nobody builds the alternative.

Why it matters

Identity checks are becoming ubiquitous across age, work and services. Each new check without privacy-preserving rails adds surveillance infrastructure and another single point of failure. An open selective-disclosure standard is the difference between proving a fact about yourself and handing over the document that proves everything else too.

What would fill it

An open, DIATF-certified selective-disclosure credential standard using zero-knowledge proofs of age and right-to-work, with a funded open-source reference implementation, mandated as an accepted option in OSA age-assurance guidance and in the digital ID scheme.

// Build now: First artefact: open-source selective-disclosure spec and reference implementation; DIATF certification and Ofcom mandate are the state-led end-state.

Why urgency 4

Identity checks are hardening into surveillance rails, nobody is building the open alternative, and the state wallet's architecture is being decided now, before unlinkability can be designed in.

claims & evidence · 4

// each factual claim in this entry, its source, and when it was last checked. Unresolved attributions are flagged rather than hidden. Challenge any of them on the thread below.

  • 117.1verifiedchecked 2026-07-07
    Online Safety Act age-assurance duties pushed millions of users through proprietary age-verification providers from July 2025.
  • 117.2verifiedchecked 2026-10-22
    The government's digital ID consultation closed in June 2026, proposing a state wallet with right-to-work checks planned to become mandatory from 2029; the incoming government scrapped the scheme in July 2026.
    Updated at the October 2026 review: the scheme was shelved on the change of government, with the mandatory element already dropped in January 2026. Right-to-work checks continue and can be digital.
  • 117.3source to confirmchecked 2026-10-08
    The DIATF trust framework certifies providers and does not mandate unlinkability or selective disclosure.
    The gamma 0.4 framework, statutory under DUAA section 28 and in force from 1 December 2025, is now cited. The clause-level check that it mandates neither unlinkability nor selective disclosure is still to do.
  • 117.4verifiedchecked 2026-07-07
    No open-source, zero-knowledge attribute-proof standard exists for UK services to adopt freely.
    Absence claim. The cryptography exists (BBS+ signatures, W3C verifiable credentials); checked the DIATF certified-provider list and OSA age-assurance guidance for any accepted open selective-disclosure option and found none.
ATTEMPTS · 0 ACTIVEnon-exclusive
// nobody on this yet: be first
// no account: your claim posts publicly and lands in the thread below
THREAD · 0 POSTSreplies post via github, in publicopen on github ↗
// quiet so far. the dossier is the first post: reply below or take the gap.

More in Portable sovereignty

Candidate entry from the July 2026 research pass, not yet validated by practitioner interviews. Added 2026-07-07 · last verified 2026-10-22 · review by 2027-01-07. Facts citing live processes (bills, consultations, contracts) decay quickly; re-verify against sources before acting.