Statutory lobbying register still excludes in-house lobbyists

openclaimed ·shipped ·
What is missing

The Lobbying Act 2014 register covers only consultant lobbyists contacting ministers and permanent secretaries; in-house corporate lobbyists (most of the industry) are exempt. PACAC's post-legislative scrutiny and Transparency International UK's November 2025 review documented the regime's weaknesses, yet the December 2025 Anti-Corruption Strategy contained no lobbying commitment at all, a gap the UK Anti-Corruption Coalition called out explicitly. Baroness Hayter's Lobbying Transparency (In-house Lobbyists) Bill, introduced 1 June 2026, is a Lords private member's bill with no government backing. Departmental meeting disclosures remain quarterly, published months late, with one-line purpose descriptions.

Why it matters

Greensill demonstrated how in-house and informal lobbying escapes the register entirely. Without coverage of in-house lobbyists and timely meeting data, the public record of who influences UK policy is structurally incomplete, and every future scandal is discovered by journalists rather than disclosure.

What would fill it

A government-backed amendment extending registration to in-house lobbying (adopting the Hayter Bill), plus a single machine-readable platform publishing ministerial, SpAd and senior-official meetings monthly with meaningful subject descriptions.

// State-led: Instrument: government-backed amendment adopting the Hayter Bill; in-house lobbying data cannot exist without the statutory duty.

Why urgency 2

In-house lobbyists, most of the industry, stay off the register; a ready private-member bill exists but government omitted lobbying entirely from its strategy, so pressure is low.

ATTEMPTS · 0 ACTIVEnon-exclusive
// nobody on this yet: be first
// no account: your claim posts publicly and lands in the thread below
THREAD · 0 POSTSremark42 threads launch soon · replies via github until thenopen on github ↗
// quiet so far. the dossier is the first post: reply below or take the gap.

Distinct but adjacent

More in Corruption & integrity

Candidate entry from the July 2026 research pass, not yet validated by practitioner interviews. Added 2026-07-07 · last verified 2026-07-07 · review by 2026-10-07. Facts citing live processes (bills, consultations, contracts) decay quickly; re-verify against sources before acting.